Design Around What Is There, Not What Was Drawn.
Record drawings are a hypothesis. Field designating is how it gets tested. We produce utility data at a stated quality level, in formats that carry into your drawing set instead of dying as paint on a job site.
A conflict found in design costs a redraw. Found in the field, it costs a change order.
Utility conflicts do not get cheaper with time. Discovered during design, a conflict is a line moved on a sheet. Discovered during construction, it is a stopped crew, an RFI, a redesign, and a claim.
The information that prevents that is not exotic. It is knowing where the existing utilities actually run, at a quality level you can defend, before the set is final.
- Utility conflict analysis during design
- Existing conditions verified against record drawings
- Designated positions collected with GPS in the field
- Measured depths at crossings where clearance is tight
- Discrepancies documented rather than silently corrected

Built to Carry Into Your Workflow
The test of a deliverable is whether your team can use it without calling us.
Georeferenced Utility Map
PDF exhibit and KMZ tied to real coordinates, color-coded by utility type with a legend.
Learn more →Coordinate Data
Point and line data in the coordinate system your project uses, when you need it in CAD or GIS.
Stated Quality Levels
Utility information labeled by how it was obtained, so nobody treats a record-drawing line as a verified one.
Learn more →Engineering & Survey Questions
Is this a survey?
What quality level should we specify?
Can you deliver in our coordinate system?
Will you work from our existing record drawings?
Do you provide sealed deliverables?
Can you support us during construction too?
Designing near existing utilities?
Send the site and the design phase. We will recommend the quality level that actually fits the decision.
Ready to scope utility investigation?
Send the project location, the design phase, the coordinate system, and the quality level your scope calls for.
